- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:32:02 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Chris Pearce wrote: > > So the task spinning the event loop has run up to the point of spinning > the event loop, then we run the synchronous section, and then the task > which was spinning the event loop will resume after its goal is met at > some later time? Sounds right. > In the case of a tasks which invokes an algorithm which has a > synchronous section, and then pauses the event loop (such calling > window.alert()), we should not run the synchronous section until the > event loop pause has completed? Currently, yeah. We might want to make "pause" also trigger synchronous sections, if that's a problem. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 16:32:02 UTC