W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2010

[whatwg] Please consider making <summary> more generic/flexible (or renaming)

From: Andrew Hayward <andrew.hayward+whatwg.specs@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:20:22 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimR7Nfs+BNmn=ZGzvYQTv06ABDz=eP_9NZSDXwY@mail.gmail.com>
> Summary: the new <summary> element is very generic sounding but has a
> very special purpose (only allowed inside <details>). It would be
> helpful if we made it more generic, in particular allow use of
> <summary> inside <article> <body> (and perhaps <section>) to provide
> general "summary" text semantics (e.g. this paragraph :), and a
> potential enhancement to the HTML5-to-Atom conversion algorithm.
> Alternatively, we could rename summary inside details to something
> more specific so it won't be confused as a generic-sounding
> element/feature.

In a somewhat related note, following a real-world conversation I had
with Jeremy Keith a short while ago, is there a reason why <summary>
(or the theoretical renamed less generic alternative) isn't being used
inside <figure>s too, instead of another new element (<figcaption>)?
At the time Jeremy wasn't able to give me an answer, but if it's
already been discussed and I just missed it, my apologies.

- Andrew
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 14:20:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:25 UTC