- From: Adam Barth <whatwg@adambarth.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:06:43 -0500
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mike Wilson<mikewse at hotmail.com> wrote: > Ok, that sort of defeats the point as it will not be possible > to depend on this security function for HTML5 features released > before its appearance in the standard - my idea was that f ex > WebStorage would refer to (and require) the new enhanced > security model. WebStorage has already shipped in several implementations that do not implement this enhanced security model. Adam
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 06:06:43 UTC