- From: Peter Brawley <pb@artfulsoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:47:57 -0500
Simon, Thanks for the interest. >I would presume that Peter is asking for frameset, frame and noframes >to be part of the set of conforming elements in HTML. Correct, Peter? Yep! PB ----- Simon Pieters wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:43:03 +0200, Eduard Pascual > <herenvardo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> For it to be taken >> seriously by the editor, I strongly recommend that you send spec-ready >> quality text, > > I recommend sticking to use cases, requirements, links to real-world > pages, and proposed solutions with pros/cons. > > >> <frameset> is not being removed from HTML. > > It's being removed from the set of conforming elements in HTML, along > with e.g. <applet>. It's not being removed from what browsers have to > implement: HTML5 specs frameset for browsers in the parsing, rendering > and obsolete features sections. > > >> It's just not being updated >> because there was nothing to add to it, so it stays the same. > > Not really: > > Elements in the following list are entirely obsolete, and must not be > used by authors: > > frame > frameset > noframes > > Either use iframe and CSS instead, or use server-side includes to > generate complete pages with the various invariant parts merged in. > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features > > > >> Taking all this together, here comes again: the question I have >> already asked several times, and you haven't answered: What are you >> asking for? > > I would presume that Peter is asking for frameset, frame and noframes > to be part of the set of conforming elements in HTML. Correct, Peter? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2428 - Release Date: 10/11/09 06:39:00 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091012/c3bf8f96/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 00:47:57 UTC