- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:24:37 +0200
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Oct 10, 2009, at 08:20, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> I think the HTML5 requirement should be changed to allow any header in >> the Permanent Message Header Field Registry. Effectively, this would >> require either an RFC or an Open Standard. This seems just as good for >> HTML5's purposes as requiring an RFC. > > I disagree unless we really want to enable http-equiv as a way of > specifying browser-only HTTP header equivalents that intermediaries ignore. I think that's an orthogonal discussion. Requiring "RFC" when the IETF requires something different appears to be a bug. > ... > As for X-UA-Compatible specifically, when Microsoft did it, it was > decried as a bad thing. Why does it become a good thing when Google does > it? > ... It doesn't. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 00:24:37 UTC