- From: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 22:32:03 +0200
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Peter Brawley <pb at artfulsoftware.com> wrote: >>So why *are* >>frames banned, if you can easily replace them with iframes and get the >>exact same lousy behavior? Because iframes also have less evil uses, >>and frames don't, I guess? > > Designation of reasonable uses as "evil" is authoritarian nonsense. > > PB Both <frameset> and <iframe> are a source of several issues. Everything that can be achieved with <frameset> can be done through <table>+<iframe>. What'd be the point of keeping two sources of issues when one can be enough to cover all use-cases? Since <iframe> can handle all the use-cases for <frameset>, and some that <frameset> just can't, it's obvious which one to drop. Regards, Eduard Pascual
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 13:32:03 UTC