- From: Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:21:15 -0500
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Rob Ennals <rob.ennals at gmail.com> wrote: > How about this for a solution for the localStorage mutex problem: > > "the user agent MAY release the storage mutex on *any* API operation except > localStorage itself" > > This guarantees that the common case of "several storage operations in a row > with nothing in-between" works, but gives the implementors the freedom to > release the storage mutex wherever else they find they need to. How does it guarantee that? Can't the user agent release the mutex due to activity in another process/thread, between operations that are sequential in a given script? Mike
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:21:15 UTC