W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2009

[whatwg] localStorage mutex - a solution?

From: Rob Ennals <rob.ennals@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:13:03 -0800
Message-ID: <3C068FE7-8FB3-4477-A092-1780985FEF0D@gmail.com>
[this is Rob Ennals from Intel, posting from gmail over my phone while  
at tpac]

How about this for a solution for the localStorage mutex problem:

"the user agent MAY release the storage mutex on *any* API operation  
except localStorage itself"

This guarantees that the common case of "several storage operations in  
a row with nothing in-between" works, but gives the implementors the  
freedom to release the storage mutex wherever else they find they need  

I ran this by a few people at the W3C tpac (where I am now) and  
everyone I talked to seemed to think this would work.

Let the objections commence.....

Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:13:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:18 UTC