- From: Rob Ennals <rob.ennals@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:13:03 -0800
[this is Rob Ennals from Intel, posting from gmail over my phone while at tpac] How about this for a solution for the localStorage mutex problem: "the user agent MAY release the storage mutex on *any* API operation except localStorage itself" This guarantees that the common case of "several storage operations in a row with nothing in-between" works, but gives the implementors the freedom to release the storage mutex wherever else they find they need to. I ran this by a few people at the W3C tpac (where I am now) and everyone I talked to seemed to think this would work. Let the objections commence..... -Rob
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:13:03 UTC