- From: <jjcogliati-whatwg@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
That is a potential problem, but for MPEG-1 it is less of a problem than with newer codecs. Since the near complete MPEG-1 committee draft was publicly available in December 1991, remaining patents for decoding of the full MPEG-1 spec should be expiring in the 2012 timeframe or before. The next question is why not just wait until the complete MPEG-1 can be decoded? If there is still no decision on a suitable codec for HTML5 when MPEG-1 becomes royalty free and MPEG-1 decoding starts showing up in things like gstreamer's good set of plugins then the full MPEG-1 might be worth considering then. --- On Sat, 5/30/09, Den.Molib <den.molib at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Den.Molib <den.molib at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [whatwg] MPEG-1 subset proposal for HTML5 video codec > To: jjcogliati-whatwg at yahoo.com, whatwg at lists.whatwg.org > Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 5:20 AM > I'm afraid that if using a subset of > a bigger, patented, standard. > Some browsers will include the full codec. Web authors see > their videos > reproduce correctly, and put them in the web thinking > they're 'standard', > while the user agents including only the license-free > version won't be > able to view them. > Thus de facto requiring the full support for the web, in > what could be > considered a variant of 'embrace and extend' issues, even > if not > intentional. > > > >
Received on Sunday, 31 May 2009 07:05:46 UTC