- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:45:34 -0700
Seems like a reasonable idea. I don't know if it's been brought up before. My guess is that Ian will say this should be re-examined for HTML6, though. J On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Joseph Pecoraro <joepeck02 at gmail.com>wrote: > It sounds like there wasn't any discussion on this. I recently heard talk > of other potential Storage areas [2]. That would make this idea even more > appealing to me. Does this sound like something worth adding? Any > comments? > > [2]: > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020485.html > > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 1: 44PM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote: > > The "storage" event [1] fires for both sessionStorage and localStorage. >> To me, this means if you only want to interact with localStorage you will >> have to manually ensure that it is the storage area being modified: >> >> window.addEventListener('storage', function(e) { >> if ( e.storageArea === localStorage ) { >> // ... >> } >> } >> >> Was there any discussion about creating events specific to the storage >> object, or should that already be possible? I've been playing around with >> WebKit's Storage implementation, and the following (understandably) is not >> possible: >> >> > localStorage.addEventListener >> undefined >> >> Is there any way to listen to events for a single specific storage area or >> is the previously mentioned approach preferred? >> >> Cheers, >> Joe >> >> [1]: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#the-storage-event >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090622/ac40f19b/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 09:45:34 UTC