- From: King InuYasha <ngompa13@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:06:05 -0500
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Peter Kasting <pkasting at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mainly because ffmpeg has way more than H.264 and other MPEG4 profile >> codecs. FFmpeg has a lot more than MPEG4 and MPEG2 and having licenses just >> for those might not be enough. >> > > Why are you assuming that the FFMPEG binaries with Google Chrome are > compiled with support for all possible codecs that the FFMPEG sources can be > compiled to support? > > PK > Because until about 10 minutes ago, I was unaware that FFmpeg could be compiled to strip out codecs that you don't want. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090606/53d82b9c/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 15:06:05 UTC