- From: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:03:59 -0700
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote: > Mainly because ffmpeg has way more than H.264 and other MPEG4 profile > codecs. FFmpeg has a lot more than MPEG4 and MPEG2 and having licenses just > for those might not be enough. > Why are you assuming that the FFMPEG binaries with Google Chrome are compiled with support for all possible codecs that the FFMPEG sources can be compiled to support? PK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090606/68b15071/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 15:03:59 UTC