- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:14:46 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> > >> Is the implication here that Shift_JIS and Shift-JIS are distinct > >> despite the encoding matching rules in Unicode not allowing for that? If > >> that is the case I think we need new matching rules. > >> > >> If the implication is something else I'd like to know. > > > > I don't understand the question. > > Part of my email was the data that Shift_JIS supposedly is a subset of > Windows-31J and Shift-JIS supposedly is a subset of Windows-932. (Note > the dash versus underscore.) Ah, ok. I thought you were refering to the change I made to the spec. My apologies. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 01:28:44 UTC