- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:40:43 +0200
Is the implication here that Shift_JIS and Shift-JIS are distinct despite the encoding matching rules in Unicode not allowing for that? If that is the case I think we need new matching rules. If the implication is something else I'd like to know. On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:19:05 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, ?istein E. Andersen wrote: >> [...] >> >> In addition, Shift_JIS < Windows-31J, and all browsers implement this >> mapping, >> so the following should be added: >> Shift_JIS -> Windows-31J > > Added. >> [...] >> >> Shift-JIS encoding for Japanese >> =============================== >> >> Shift-JIS supports: >> - ASCII >> - Katakana >> - JIS X 0208-1990/1997 >> >> All browsers furthermore supports NEC symbols as well as IBM extensions >> in >> both NEC and IBM (Shift-JIS) positions. This is actually Windows-932: >> >> Shift-JIS < Windows-932 >> >> [...] -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 00:40:43 UTC