W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2009

[whatwg] Codecs for <video> and <audio>

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:52:54 -0400
Message-ID: <7c2a12e20907070652t5c5bdfc8s8bd8e6746d0a988@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Kornel<kornel at geekhood.net> wrote:
> Similarly, authors publishing <video> MUST put at least one source in Theora
> or H.264

This isn't future-proof.  It's also not reasonable if you happen to
know that all of your clients' browsers support some third format
(e.g. on an intranet), or if you don't care about those who don't for
some reason.  I don't think it adds anything.

> SHOULD publish both.

HTML 5 should not recommend that all sites SHOULD use a
patent-encumbered format, any more than it should recommend that they
SHOULD use Flash for fallback (which is what's really needed for
compatibility in practice).
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 06:52:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:14 UTC