W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2009

[whatwg] Codecs for <audio> and <video> -- informative note?

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:00:59 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830907070300q1cbe76cu9c72169dabb7c46c@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, David Gerard<dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/7/6 Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com>:
>
>> "As of 2009, there is no single efficient codec which works on all
>> modern browsers. ?Content producers are encouraged to supply the video
>> in both Theora and H.264 formats, as per the following example"
>
>
> A spec that makes an encumbered format a "SHOULD" is unlikely to be
> workable for those content providers, e.g. Wikimedia, who don't have
> the money, and won't under principle, to put up stuff in a format
> rendered radioactive by known enforced patents. Your wording presumes
> a paid Web all the way through.


According to http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Licensing,
the "W3C will not approve a Recommendation if it is aware that
Essential Claims exist which are not available on Royalty-Free terms".
So, until the time that H.264 is available royalty-free, I do not see
how it can be included - in particular since there is a royalty-free
alternative.

Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 03:00:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:14 UTC