- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:18:56 -0400
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:01 AM, David Gerard<dgerard at gmail.com> wrote: > A spec that makes an encumbered format a "SHOULD" is unlikely to be > workable for those content providers, e.g. Wikimedia, who don't have > the money, and won't under principle, to put up stuff in a format > rendered radioactive by known enforced patents. That's why "should" is not the same as "must". Those who have a good reason not to do it can decline to do it.
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 11:18:56 UTC