- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > The codecs issue is being still actively worked on by a number of > > parties, as it has been for over a year now; the removal of the > > sections from the spec doesn't affect this. I still hold high hopes > > that one day we can find a solution to this that all vendors are > > willing to implement. > > The bit that would be important to keep is the list of requirements on a > baseline codec. The only real requirement is that all the relevant implementors be willing to ship support for the codec. I think pretty much everyone understand the requirements that the various parties have for that (though it varies from vendor to vendor). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 23:11:25 UTC