- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:26:28 +1000
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Ian Hickson<ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> > >> That I can understand. But in this case, you should leave the paragraph >> in the spec that states the need for a baseline codec, since the >> situation hasn't changed and we are still striving for a baseline codec. > > I'm not holding up the spec just because we haven't found a codec to use > with the spec. This working group can override me on this if it is the > desire of the group, but in the meantime, I'm trying to drive down to Last > Call by October and part of that is going through open issues and either > resolving them, or admitting that they can't be resolved by then and > moving on. The alternative is to deadlock, and that is worse. OK, that answers my earlier question of "why now". That action I can understand. But then I would say we should have a collection of things that we need to work on for a second version of HTML5, which obviously includes the baseline codec question and also audio/video a11y, and probably many more things I am not aware of. Is there such a list somewhere? Since all these things are now being pulled out of the spec, they need to continue living somewhere else. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:26:28 UTC