W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2009

[whatwg] Web Storage: apparent contradiction in spec

From: Linus Upson <linus@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:42:27 -0700
Message-ID: <661ec83d0908271942oec0f055t1ef5d1495a3e952e@mail.gmail.com>
My concerns are around browser UAs. AIR, Dashboard, XULRunner, Extensions,
etc. can have different policies. I simply want clicking on links in my
browser to be safe.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Linus Upson<linus at google.com> wrote:
> > I don't think there is consensus at Google yet.
> > I'm not saying that UAs shouldn't provide file-like lifetime semantics
> for
> > storage. I'm just saying the user should decide, not the web page.
> Linus, are you only considering traditional in-browser web apps that
> don't go through an "install" process of any sort (i.e., I go to a URL
> in my web browser)?
> Would you hold a different opinion for different types of HTML5-based
> applications (like the TiddlyWiki app that gets copied locally)? Or
> would you require that all apps go through an install process that
> acquires quota, permissions, etc.?
> It seems like others are objecting to your position based on different
> application models than the ones you have in mind.
> -- Dirk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090827/1b6b5193/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 19:42:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:16 UTC