- From: Jens Alfke <snej@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:23:34 -0700
On Aug 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > Would you hold a different opinion for different types of HTML5-based > applications (like the TiddlyWiki app that gets copied locally)? Or > would you require that all apps go through an install process that > acquires quota, permissions, etc.? Locally-stored apps are a different story. But I don't necessarily see TiddlyWiki (or similar apps) as working that way. It currently has to be saved to a local HTML file because its only mechanism for saving content is to self-modify its source. With HTML5 persistent storage, there's no reason it couldn't live on a server like tiddlywiki.com. With app-caching support too, it would work offline just as well as the current version does. ?Jens
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 10:23:34 UTC