- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:01:41 -0700
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk at opera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:47:32 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: >> The problem is that you can't use fragment identifiers with data-URIs. >> >> For example >> >> data:text/plain,hello world#frag >> >> Represents a text/plain document with the contents: >> >> hello world#frag >> >> It does not represent the 'frag' part of a document with the text 'hello >> world'. > > Actually, I think that is false (and a bug in Firefox). At the time the data URI RFC was written RFC 2396 was still the URI RFC and there fragment identifiers were not a formal part of the URI syntax but rather something you could append to any URI during retrieval operations, which is clearly what data URIs are for. Would be great to get clarification on that. Safari seems to behave the same (though not if you modify a fragment on a already entered uri) / Jonas
Received on Saturday, 15 August 2009 01:01:41 UTC