- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:36:22 -0700
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > Ojan Vafai wrote: > >> If a linear list of things the event is targeting is sufficient, of >> course, and we're ok with the random third argument of >> addEventListener being carted around, then we might be ok using it... >> >> I think this is sufficient. Although it is a bit unfortunate that dispatch >> order is undefined. >> > > Those are unrelated issues, aren't they? The linear list I was referring > to is the proposed parentNode (or equivalent) chain; order there is > well-defined, presumably. For each element in this list, one can have > multiple listeners for the event; the dispatch order here is currently > undefined, but that could be changed. > Sorry, I had misread this. Although, I think a linear list of things the event is targeting is sufficient. Is there a reason that they can't dispatch in a guaranteed order? >> > > You'd probably have to check with the folks who wrote DOM2 Events, if the > question is why the spec says what it says. > > If the question is about current implementations, nothing obvious jumps out > at me in the one implementation I'm familiar with (Gecko's). > Yeah, I'm more interested in implementation difficulties. I can't think of anything obvious in WebKit's implementation either, but I'm not too familiar with the event handling code. Ojan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090424/010267ad/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 19:36:22 UTC