- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:34:38 -0700
On Sep 28, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf at dione.cc> > wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > There is no way in the world that Microsoft would implement your > option 3 in a security update to IE6. > > Sure, I'm not implying this. I simply have doubts about any other > major security changes making it into MSIE8 or Firefox 3. > > As one of the people who makes these decisions, I can tell you that > I'd be a lot more comfortable cramming option 1 into Firefox 3 or > 3.1 than option 3. Apart from the other reasons I've already raised, > option 1, being much simpler and with few degrees of freedom, would > take a lot less time to analyze and converge on a spec. As one of the people who helps decide for Safari, I would agree that option 1 is a lot more likely to make it into a security update than option 3. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 21:34:38 UTC