W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2008

[whatwg] video tag : loop for ever

From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:51:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CB2F5649E407403694A78F4289E0CF1F@POCZTOWIEC>
There are multiple ways to encapsulate heterogeneous data in documents:
application resources (the "res" URL scheme), file archives (jar, zip, shar,
tar, whatever).  Of those possibilities, MIME is most Web-friendly IMHO,
although the downside is that the transmitted resource grows.  This should
not be a problem for small resources and using it for big resources does not
gain you anything, so you just get it as a separate file.  And, as has been
previously discussed, "jar" is not a protocol, it is a content type.

Chris

 

  _____  

From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:36 PM
To: Kristof Zelechovski
Cc: whatwg; Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Subject: Re: [whatwg] video tag : loop for ever

 

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Kristof Zelechovski
<giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote:

Multiple AUDIO elements require one request per element unless they refer to
the same stream or they use the data URL scheme, or the whole page is
packaged as multipart/mixed, which would indeed be nice for such sets of
small resources if only user agents supported it.


This is a great use case for the "jar:" protocol.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081029/5405a17d/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 12:51:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:06 UTC