- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Garrett Smith wrote: > > I found a few mistakes in the spec. > > =========================================================== > 5.1. Successful form controls > The controls that are successful are those that are included in the > submission (in the form data set) when their form is submitted. > > All form controls are successful except: > > Controls with no associated form. > Controls that are inside repetition templates (those that are in their > forms' templateElements list). > Controls that are inside datalist elements. > Controls with no name, except if they are image controls. > Disabled controls. > Checkboxes that are not checked. > Radio buttons that are not checked. > Submit buttons (including image buttons) that did not initiate the > current submission process. > Buttons of type button, reset, add, remove, move-up, or move-down. > Output controls. > File upload controls with no value selected, or with only values that > point to non-existent files. > Controls do not have to have a value to be successful. > =========================================================== > > missing: > * Readonly controls (just like how it works in HTML 4) These do submit, it is not a mistake that they are not listed. > * controls within a fieldset that is disabled Those controls are disabled, so that is covered already. > * controls whose associated FORM (either FIELDSET or FORM element) is > either disabled or readonly. We currently have no way to disable or mark as readonly an entire form. > The WF2 spec does include the attribute disabled for a fieldset, but > does not say that disabling a fieldset has *any* effect whatsoever. > This, to me, seems to be an oversight. Fixed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 00:52:22 UTC