- From: Sander van Zoest <sander@vanzoest.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:35:22 -0700
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > <snip> > > > I am very reluctant to make up a whole > > new microsyntax and corresponding parser algorithm, along with all the > > tests, etc, to handle this one case. > > I still don't understand why the spec has to define each and every > parser algorythm (IMO, it should only define the syntax, and then the > implementation should define its own algorythm that parses that syntax > as defined); but if that's the issue then a microsyntax can be > perfectly avoided by splitting the argument into two separate ones, > such as pixelratiox and pixelratioy. The only issue I have with splitting it into separate ones, is that we need to ensure that both exist or none exist, having just X or just Y is clearly confusing and should not be allowed. -- Sander -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081015/a4e7f6d4/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 09:35:22 UTC