- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:34:31 -0500
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Brenton Strine <Brenton.Strine at citrix.com>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Andy Lyttle <whatwg at phroggy.com> wrote: > [snip] > > 4) <label> (moving label textual content into <input> as placeholder > text; currently with Javascript to mutate the DOM, in the > future with CSS > to present the desired appearance while keeping the DOM stable) > > Pro: Most semantic. > [snip] > > That depends on what you are using it for. What if you are using it to > apply a placeholder that says "(optional)"? That is not a label at all. > There are a lot of uses for the proposed placeholder attribute that just > don't fit into any of the other categories. I think a placeholder attribute > would be great. Hmm, true. That's definitely a case where the text can't be argued to be a label. Of course, it's still not in any way semantic. The only difference between "(optional)" being displayed near the input and being displayed *within* the input is one of aesthetics. The meaning of the document isn't changed one iota. This leans me even more toward a CSS solution. I'll just bite the bullet and bring it up to the CSS WG. ~TJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081002/b396b9cc/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:34:31 UTC