- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:14:53 +0200
I hoped to see an example of an actual semantic improvement of introducing INPUT[type=SEARCH]. Maciej described a conceptual improvement for the ideal world; in the real world, the developers will have to use the heuristics anyway because there are search fields in the wild not marked as such and most of them will remain that way of course. Please describe how the potential presence of INPUT[type=SEARCH] will improve the user experience (ignoring presentation) based on the assumption that the present heuristics will be used anyway. Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:10 AM To: Nils Dagsson Moskopp Cc: whatwg Subject: Re: [whatwg] native styling for search input boxes >> User agents and assistive technologies could use the >> knowledge that a field is a search field in all sorts of helpful >> ways. > What exactly were you imagining ? In the end, it's a text field like > any > other. For example, Chrome will keep track of search fields that the user has used on various pages. I assume they currently use a heuristic, this would be a clear signal of search-fieldness. (I do not speak for the Chrome team here and I do not know if they would want to use it.
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 01:14:53 UTC