[whatwg] Combining the DedicatedWorker and SharedWorker interfaces

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> I feel that it probably is not productive to continue discussing details 
> when there is disagreement on the large-scale shape of the API between 
> myself, Jonas, and Hixie. My opinion on this detail, for example, 
> probably varies depending on whether there is a startConversation() 
> method on shared workers, dedicated workers, neither, or both.

I'm going through the feedback right now, for what it's worth.

In general I think the startConversation() issue is a red herring. The 
method was added just as a convenience and isn't really needed. I can 
remove it if it would make the discussions simpler.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 16:37:54 UTC