W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2008

[whatwg] ---

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:11:56 +0200
Message-ID: <134DC4C5-AEB5-4288-AFEB-ABD86C950C4B@iki.fi>
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:46, Pentasis wrote:

> <var> is the best example I think. Why <var> but not <function>  
> <operator> <operand> etc. etc. etc.? And if code gets this attention  
> why not language? (<verb>, <noun> etc. etc.) If we do it like that  
> it would never work.


<var>, <cite> and <dfn> (and, one might argue, <em>) are legacy  
elements flowing out of a desire to replace <i> with something  
"semantic".

Since the elements are part of the HTML legacy, there isn't a great  
rationale that would justify their inclusion today if they had never  
been in HTML and were proposed as new elements now.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2008 02:11:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:07 UTC