W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2008

[whatwg] Thoughts on HTML 5

From: Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:24:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1210760694.6229.3.camel@a1dmin.vola.spe.com.pl>
I recommend <transcript> because it refers to a conversation that has
been put down, as compared to a live <conversation> (I do not recommend
introducing the latter, of course, as HTML is not live).

Chris

Dnia 2008-05-14, ?ro o godzinie 11:31 +0900, Karl Dubost pisze:
> Le 14 mai 2008 ? 07:09, Ian Hickson a ?crit :
> > That's probably the best suggestion so far, but I'm still not  
> > convinced
> > it's really much better than <dialog>. I think it has at least as many
> > other interpretations (e.g. what we call a "talk" over here is  
> > really a
> > slide show).
> 
> food for thoughts
> 
> * <colloquy>
> * <conversation> (probably too long)
> * <chat>      (probably too IRC, messenger oriented, though here
>                 I suspect my own distortion field. People often says
>                 "let's have a chat".)
> * <dialogue>  (was wondering if it was less geeky than dialog, not sure)
> * <discourse>
> * <speech>
> * <talking>
> * <converse>
> 
> 	
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 03:24:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:02 UTC