- From: Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:57:32 -0800
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote: > Given that most people don't know the difference between the Window and > the global object and the global worker object will already contain a > bunch of APIs identical to those on the Window object it seems to me that > giving the object and interface a different name doesn't really help. I'm not necessarily sold on making the worker context be the global object. I always thought having the Window object be the global object was a bit unfortunate, myself. What if we had separate objects: - the global scope (with all the typical JS globals, and maybe XMLHttpRequest) - workerContext (with all the worker stuff, plus cookies, location, etc) Thoughts? - a
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:57:32 UTC