- From: Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:23:09 -0800
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Adam Barth <hk9565 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > This problem exists today with postMessage() too. Do people think we > > should go fully asynchronous? > > I had assumed it was asynchronous (and I think others might make the > same assumption) because the PostMessage API in Windows is > asynchronous. The synchronous version in the Windows API is called > SendMessage. I assumed it was asynchronous too. - a
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 11:23:09 UTC