W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2008

[whatwg] reply() extension to postMessage()

From: Adam Barth <hk9565@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:16:55 -0800
Message-ID: <7789133a0802141116v4e3af022q489ef318a4f01df6@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>  This problem exists today with postMessage() too. Do people think we
>  should go fully asynchronous?

I had assumed it was asynchronous (and I think others might make the
same assumption) because the PostMessage API in Windows is
asynchronous.  The synchronous version in the Windows API is called

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 11:16:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:00 UTC