[whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

It seems you believe in code generators.  I do not share your belief.  A
comment "Do not touch --- generated code" means to me the formal language
used is at fault and that I should rather find another language to use.
(Unless we are talking about a secondary form, of course, but what is the
primary form then?)
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 11:55 PM
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Kristof Zelechovski; whatwg at whatwg.org; 'Manu Sporny'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

> though I agree with others
> that the complexity (lengthy URIs, qname/curie cruft) is an issue.
> Especially given the copy & paste authors you want to enable this for,
> down the road.

I'm confused. Copy&Paste is meant to abstract out the complexity for
simple web publishers.

-Ben

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 15:12:15 UTC