- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:12:15 +0200
It seems you believe in code generators. I do not share your belief. A comment "Do not touch --- generated code" means to me the formal language used is at fault and that I should rather find another language to use. (Unless we are talking about a secondary form, of course, but what is the primary form then?) Chris -----Original Message----- From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 11:55 PM To: Anne van Kesteren Cc: Kristof Zelechovski; whatwg at whatwg.org; 'Manu Sporny' Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency > though I agree with others > that the complexity (lengthy URIs, qname/curie cruft) is an issue. > Especially given the copy & paste authors you want to enable this for, > down the road. I'm confused. Copy&Paste is meant to abstract out the complexity for simple web publishers. -Ben
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 15:12:15 UTC