- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:59:26 +0200
The copying and pasting is never transparent, there is always postprocessing on the server side. The server can transform RDFa input, clean it up and put relevant information into the HEAD to make us both happy. This is how Wikipedia works; nobody protests that "<math>" is not in HTML because it never makes it to the resulting page (although the fact that "<math >" is not supported is confusing - this seems easy to fix). I am not opposing local metadata; I have already explained you can use the SCRIPT element for the purpose. I only say that metadata should not be inside content they describe in order to avoid circularity. This is a philosophical objection, not a technical one. Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:45 PM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: whatwg at lists.whatwg.org; 'Eduard Pascual'; 'Shannon' Subject: Re: [whatwg] Ghosts from the past and the semantic Web Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > If the blog site allows users to use a nonstandard license, it should > support the metadata model you propose, i.e. it should provide a way to > inject that information in the HEAD. However, when I post to a public > forum, I have to obey the forum's rules, which include subscribing to their > license in most cases. Again, I would appreciate if you could allow Creative Commons to define Creative Commons' needs, especially when it comes to changing the way licenses are imposed on people. We've seen from our usage that the most we can expect a user to do is to add *one* chunk of HTML to their site. That's it. That chunk has to be both user-visible and machine-readable. But even without CC, you're making a number of assumptions that are fairly narrow, in order to fit your point that someone should not be able to define any metadata for a chunk of HTML. I think it's clear that the Ubiquity example shows how your assumption is false. There is value in embedded metadata that is fully expressible in a *chunk* of HTML that can be copied and pasted wherever you want. -Ben
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 11:59:26 UTC