- From: Charles <lists07@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:10:39 -0800
>>> While we are unable correct the spelling of "referer", we certainly >>> need not duplicate it for "noreferrer". There must be some end to >>> this self-humiliation. >> >> I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the >> feature affects the Referer (sic) header. > > I too think Anne is right here... This may be one of those "never been done, so can never happen" things, but couldn't the spec as easily support both? It seems a bit silly that stuff should have to be spelled wrong to work. -- Charles
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:10:39 UTC