- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:23:36 +0000
On 4 Nov 2007, at 12:40, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:27:50 +0100, Krzysztof ??elechowski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl > > wrote: >> Dnia 03-11-2007, sob o godzinie 08:42 +0000, Ian Hickson napisa??(a): >>> Ok, I've added a rel value similar to "nofollow" called >>> "noreferer" that >>> does this. >> >> While we are unable correct the spelling of "referer", we certainly >> need >> not duplicate it for "noreferrer". There must be some end to this >> self-humiliation. > > I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the > feature affects the Referer (sic) header. I too think Anne is right here ? there are enough things that are inconsistent in the web already. Don't add another thing that requires me to think. I'll just make mistakes. A markup language should not require me to think ? it should reflect logical structure. Importantly, outwith the structure, logic dictates contextual consistency (even if that goes against being consistent with other contexts). -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 15:23:36 UTC