- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:13:13 +0200
The script <http://status.whatwg.org/annotate-web-apps.js> used throughout the specification pages, including <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-content -type-sniffing.html#content-type-sniffing>, causes an error under Internet Explorer. The fix I posted was not applied, so I repost the patch: var style = document.createElement("style"); style.type = "text/css"; // required in html4... var styleText = document.createTextNode("\ .TBW, .WIP, .SCS { margin-left:-2em; border-left:.2em solid; padding-left:1.8em; }\ .TBW { border-color:red; }\ .WIP { border-color:orange; }\ .SCS { border-color:green; }\ "); var an3err try { style.appendChild(styleText) } catch(an3err) { if(an3err.number == -0x7FFF0001) style.styleSheet.cssText = styleText.nodeValue else throw an3err } document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(style); Frustrated, Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Sander Tekelenburg Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:26 PM To: whatwg at whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] One document or two? [snip] It would be better if that wouldn't have to be such a hack though; if the spec itself would be marked up to allow reliable targeting through CSS. (For instance, Simon's CSS currently hides nothing at <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-content -type-sniffing.html#content-type-sniffing>, which doesn't seem to be aimed at web publishers.) It would also be better [snip]
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:13:13 UTC