W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2007

[whatwg] One document or two?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0705241835190.23432@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
>
> Various people have expressed opinions in favour of either one spec to 
> rule them all, or two specs for different audiences. Is not the simplest 
> solution to have two views upon the same spec?

No, it's certainly not the _simplest_ solution. It's _a_ solution, yes. 
It's been considered and might even happen. It's a MASSIVE amount of work, 
though. For example, it's also not always clear how to categorise the 
text. What would you do with:

  <p>If a <code>dl</code> element contains only <code>dd</code>
  elements, then it consists of one group with values but no names,
  and the document is non-conforming.</p>

Should that be shown in the cut down "author" version?

There are also a number of sentences that would need to be rewritten so 
they still make sense with parts of the sentences hidden.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 11:43:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:55 UTC