- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:33:41 +0200
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:30:36 +0200, Gareth Hay <gazhay at gmail.com> wrote: > Does it not follow that to be "more consistent, logical, better style, > whatever." you should wrap your code in a function that is called onload? > > Isn't that what onload is for? being triggered after the page has loaded? That load event dispatched on the <body> element also waits for all external scripts and images to be loaded. This is not always desirable. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 02:33:41 UTC