- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:33:04 +0100
At 01:48 +0000 UTC, on 2007-03-23, Nicholas Shanks wrote: > On 23 Mar 2007, at 01:30, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > >> (Note that a mechanism to allow authors to define anchors in videos >> is not a solution, because it's then still the author who is in control. >> What I'm suggesting is about giving the user control.) > > Can't we have all of: > 1) A way for authors to match up timecodes with fragment identifiers > in the fallback content That would be great, yes. Perhaps SMPTE would be useful for that? > 2) A way for UAs to skip to that time code if a fragment identifier > is requested and it's contained within fallback the UA isn't displaying > 3) And a way for users to link to timecodes that aren't marked up at > all. Yes, sure. That would be ideal. I didn't mean to imply authors should not be able to provide IDs. Just that users shouldn't be made dependant on authors bothering to provide them. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 19:33:04 UTC