- From: Nicholas Shanks <contact@nickshanks.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:48:59 +0000
On 23 Mar 2007, at 01:30, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > (Note that a mechanism to allow authors to define anchors in videos > is not a > solution, because it's then still the author who is in control. > What I'm > suggesting is about giving the user control.) Can't we have all of: 1) A way for authors to match up timecodes with fragment identifiers in the fallback content 2) A way for UAs to skip to that time code if a fragment identifier is requested and it's contained within fallback the UA isn't displaying 3) And a way for users to link to timecodes that aren't marked up at all. >>> the client doing the request should be smart enough to know to >>> escape the colon >> >> Wikipedia section IDs have lots of escaping, but it's all done by the >> wiki server, not the UA. I don't know if this is because UAs can't be >> trusted to get it right or not. > > I'm getting the impression from RFC 3986 that it is up to the app... RFCs are one thing, implementations are another. - Nicholas. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2157 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070323/6458acb4/attachment.bin>
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 18:48:59 UTC