- From: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:15:49 +0000
Gervase Markham wrote: > Gareth Hay wrote: >> I think it should be like this, as you are telling the <video> element >> to go fullscreen and *not* the page. >> That's my opinion. > > I guess that's the heart of it. My view is the opposite. I don't think > video should be special in this regard. > > If you want to see an embedded image full screen, you do "View Image", > then "Full Screen". Why can video not be the same? Of course, the page > should have the option (with the event I mentioned) of making doing > "Full Screen" for the browser Do The Right Thing with the video, if they > think that's what the Right Thing is. And maybe that would become the > norm on video sharing sites. > Incidentally, although I'm in favour of the full-screen feature under discussion being for full-screen *video*, not full-screen pages, I'm not arguing that this should be mandated by the spec. This is something that browsers could choose to offer, just as they could choose to offer full-screen images as you mention in your example. Given that showing a video or image full-screen requires no co-operation from the page it was embedded on, it doesn't need to be in the spec. It's a browser implementation detail.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 10:15:49 UTC