- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:10:09 +0100
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:07:17 +0100, Nicholas Shanks <contact at nickshanks.com> wrote: > So what's the problem? > Content with a doctype of <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE htmlplus> is > treated correctly, and content without a doctype is handled in quirks > mode, where the UA can look for </image> and if found in a suitable > place, treat the start tag as <image>, or if not found, treat the > start tag as <img>. Any content using <image> in strict mode with > another HTML doctype is broken anyway, so it doesn't really matter > how that looks. Oh yes, lets upgrade DOCTYPE sniffing to the 20th century. Fricking awesome. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 18:10:09 UTC