- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:05:17 +0100
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:30:34 +0100, Kornel Lesinski <kornel at osiolki.net> wrote: >> If <video> elements would have native UIs, bloggers would be more >> attracted of it, and developers of video sites as well. In the above >> case, you'd only have: >> >> <video src="http://www.youtube.com/v/id"> > I doubt YouTube would allow that. Such video (even with UI provided by > browser) lacks features that YouTube probably would require: branding > and link to their website. Here is the answer to their branding: http://javimoya.com/blog/youtube_en.php Who wants to strip this stuff, always will. However, the possibility to do <img src="http://flickr.com/..."> doesn't put photo hosting services out of business. BTW, referrer checking would work for <video> as well as it works for <img>. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2007 16:05:17 UTC