- From: Magnus Gasslander <mg@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:40:27 +0100
Gervase Markham wrote: > Elliotte Harold wrote: >> I'm just not sure that I see a strong enough use case here to justify >> the introduction of another element most browsers will not support >> for years if ever. > > I think there's a strong driver for uptake. As I understand it, all > these video-sharing sites are paying mountains of cash to > Adobe/Macromedia for the backend software licences to support Flash > video streaming. If they could have 15 or 20% fewer servers doing > that, and stream to Firefox using Theora instead, the cost saving > would be an incentive for them to change their site. I believe the fact that the format is open and patent free is also a good driver. I am thinking about sites like wikipedia here. They are already good ambassadors for SVG and Theora ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_Use_Policy#Format ) And there is actually Theora content out there in the wild! ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15 ) And it seems like the wikipedians are looking for technical solutions to play sounds and movie clips in their articles ( http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Multimedia#Software_features ) We need to be 100% sure that the format is patent free (no more GIF). I could have one concern about the Theora licensing. I am not sure what this 'promise' not to enforce patents is worth legally ( http://www.theora.org/svn.html ). The statement is for example very focused on the on2 company. What happens if they go bankrupt or decide sell their patents? Open source licensed patents like BBC/Dirac would let me sleep a bit better i think. Especially since on2 is also behind the decoder for flash movies ( http://www.on2.com/ ) - this could possibly lead to conflicts of interests and nastiness. Like some previous posters I also think that only a few formats (or even just one) should be supported by the <video> tag. I specifically think that we should let the proprietary formats live on in the <object> world. But it may be difficult to prevent proprietary formats to slip over to <video>. /Magnus
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 12:40:27 UTC