W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2007

[whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diæresis vs umlaut]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706252143490.14519@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, ?istein E. Andersen wrote:
>
> On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:44AM, K??i??tof ??elechovski wrote:
> 
> > A stressed schwa is present in Polish maritime dialect as well 
> > (Kasz??bszczi) and Slovaks write "m??so" for "miaso" (meat), but that 
> > is not the point.  All such uses can be covered under the hood of the 
> > dieresis;
> 
> I really do not understand why these uses of the double-dot diacritic 
> should be considered as instances of the di??resis (see below).

This really is out of scope of this working group, it's more a Unicode 
Consortium issue.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 14:44:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:56 UTC