- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:50:37 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, J. King wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:53:31 -0400, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, J. King wrote: > > > > > > There are two paragraphs at the end of section 8.2.1.1: > > > > > > # When an end tag token is emitted, the content model > > > # flag must be switched to the PCDATA state. > > > # > > > # When an end tag token is emitted with attributes, > > > # that is a parse error. > > > > > > They don't seem to make sense in context; are they editing > > > artefacts? > > > > No, they're intentional... why don't they make sense? They're > > additional requirements on the tokenisation step. > > I was confused because I thought they belonged to section 8.2.1.1. I > see now that they actually belong to 8.2.1, but it's kind of difficult > to see that at a glance---8.2.1.1 is so long that the indention gets > pretty lost. Perhaps the 8.2.1.1 section should be after those two > paragraphs---or perhaps the two paragraphs should be moved to before the > list of parsing states. The paragraphs seem to fit in better with the > more general nature of the beginning of the tokenization section, I > think. Ok, moved them up. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 15:50:37 UTC